FORENSIC SCIENCE 101
1891-1902: Works of José Ruiz Blasco, Picasso's father, attributed unlawfully to Picasso by himself. The "J" of Jose was often falsified to the "P" of Pablo.
A comprehensive forensic study, dated 12-27-2002 of the authenticated works of the father of Pablo Ruiz Picasso, José Ruiz Blasco, fraudulently attributed by Picasso to himself since 1932.
In regard to the works of Isidoro Brocos Gomez, a professor of sculpture at the Instituto Da Guarda in La Coruña in 1895, they were simply stolen and were also fraudulently attributed to Picasso.
In regard to the works of Isidoro Brocos Gomez, a professor of sculpture at the Instituto Da Guarda in La Coruña in 1895, they were simply stolen and were also fraudulently attributed to Picasso.
Forensic Scientific Tests in Art. A Priority
The author, Rómulo-Antonio Tenés, published an excerpt from the book which is being discussed here in the International Herald Tribune and The New York Times on October 23, 2004, and he cited the imperative need for conducting rigorous forensic studies in the Art Market in order to prevent detrimental fraudulent practices which are contrary to investors' legitimate interests.
It is hoped that a forensic evaluation shall be provided by Universities throughout the world, Picasso Administration, S.A., the Barcelona City Council, the French State, Christie's and Sotheby's, in relation to the present research.
It has been scientifically established that the young Picasso began to draw in 1899, and to paint in 1902. Consequently the works attributed to Picasso from 1891 to 1902 are, in the majority, by José Ruiz Blasco, father of Picasso. Therefore, the works of José Ruiz must be necessarily separated from those of Picasso in the Museums of Paris, Barcelona and Málaga, lawsuit filed in the Central Trial Court in Madrid (Spain). This discovery goes against the interests of Picasso Administration, S.A., a profit-making company, which has to confront, despite its silence, the evidence.
Attributing works which predate 1902 to Pablo, a falsely defined "child prodigy" (age 10 to 16 ), is a monumental fraud. Concealing this fraud actively or passively constitutes flagrant criminal connivance.
I.S.B.N.: 84-609-6565-1
Scientific tests in Art
Art Forgery
